positive presidential campaigning

Should presidential candidates stick to positive campaigning and discuss issues or engage in negative campaigning and smear all(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal)? The policy-making existence now and days has fetch very corrupted. so wholenessr of trying to highlight where each presidential candidate stands on issues that atomic number 18 happening now, people are waying on things in the past. I believe no one is perfect and candidates are no different than invariable people. The political world needs to put emphasis on the issues that not only the United States is facing but that the hale world is facing as well. Todays media niduses on negatives. We deal about tragedies in the news, read about the livestock foodstuff crashing, but seldom do we hear about where a candidates stands on a certain issue. Unless a mortal has good researched a candidate, the people will only hear and run into biased opinions on them. It seems like every other mercantile on TV is eithe r one obstetrical delivery down Obama paid by McCain or one shoot down McCain paid by Obama.

If people dont hear the positives of candidates and only the negatives then they will be truss to choose the candidate that is the lesser of two evils. The peoples vote shouldnt be for the person who they dislike least, it should be for the candidate that they strongly support and that they think is going to do a great job running our country. The media, such as the news on TV and newspapers and even online newspapers, should really focus on giving unbiased reports and shift their focus from the negatives of the candidates to the positives of their campaigns.If you mandatory to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay