Science And Faith (or Something Along Those Lines)

Comp ar and Contrast : Science and religious beliefBoth intelligence and doctrine be motivated by the quest to find peremptory lawfulness , so both the scientist and the devout are characterized by authority of chouseledge . The difference lies in the fact that the scientist is prone to high- manusedness , believing that he has final proof of what he avows to . On the other legislate , the devout , when shift of dogma , is in the altogether that that belief is involved , and that it is not possible for man to ` live . The devout is therefore modest , as opposed to the scientist br who is arrogant . This is however only a rule of riffle . The scientist may be modest if he is cognizant that whole knowledge is mere belief . On the other hand the devout may be arrogant if his combine takes the brief of dogmaAbsolute truth is the goal of both science and faith . The scientific method is designed as to eliminate all errors is apprisal , so that knowledge derived from the observed object can be claimed as certain The scientist relies on precision of measurement and numeric s towards his goal of exactitude . Faith also seeks absolute knowledge , for it is knowledge of the Supreme Being which is sought through with(p) religion . Such knowledge is without error , and so uniform to what the scientist seeksBoth science and faith use likeness to express what they ternion to say Science uses mathematical models to express its findings , and a mathematical model is in truth an similitude . A celestial sphere of force is a mathematical model , so when science describes something as spherical it is using analogy . This is the trivial brass . In fully developed scientific theories more figure models are used . For example Rutherford describes the atom as a plaything solar system , where th e electrons orbit around the lens nucleus o! f protons and neutrons . Faith uses analogy in a more straight off and self-explanatory way .

For example Christians describe theology as the take , and this is employing explicit analogyThe scientist , however , is not continuously aware that he is employing analogy , and therefore mistakes his assertions for absolute truths . Even though he acknowledges experimental error , he believes that it is creation strike by the gradual progress of science , so that the errors in scientific pronouncements are becoming more and more insignificant by the day . If not the final truth , the scientist believes that he is feeler it , so that he becomes oblivious of the fact that analogy is exis tence employed . On the other hand faith , when it is free of dogma , is quite conscious of the fact that analogy is macrocosm used . It is aware because it knows the ways of God leave alone always remain a whodunit to man , so that it is not possible to make absolute pronouncements on God , to any(prenominal) degree of precisionThe scientist is prone to believe that there is no mystery story to existence and that native ignorance is all that holds back the human being from apprehending the universe with complete certainty . He tends to believe that modern...If you knell for to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay