Character Flaws of William Shakepeare\'s Antony

William Shakespeares Antony and Cleopatra defies the stereotypes generated from any otherwise Shakespearean drama. This hear willing discuss how Shakespeare adopts the intent of mental imagery, phrase and dramatic construction end-to-end the play in represent Antony as deeply blemish plus maintaining his stature as a tragical maven. Charles Moseley states, rebirth plays are not books, moreover a visual and auditory experience played in a special twist on a dot that carried out a spacious deal of symbolic even out for the audience. Antonys tragedy is caused by situations beyond his ability to transfigure; he is torn in the midst of his honour and his life in Alexandria. At meanwhile, he is similarly influenced by a bout of primary inner soils of pillow slip-his need of political interest, impetuousness of character and a pursuit of face-to-face pleasure. S Bethell suggests how Antony has a root in both worlds. Shakespeare does not have a unwaveringly task in making a tragic hero out of Antony as Aristotle defines a tragic hero, as a character of noble stature who has a tragic flaw (over confidence, arrogance, hubris,), and suffers a gloam that is part their fault but also due to factors beyond their control. The downfall they suffer exceeds the crime, but the tragic hero gains some appearance of self-awareness. From this statement Antony is in any sense a tragic hero as this essay will demonstrate. \nShakespeares use of language allows him to present Antony as a character to be pitied, which is paramount in characterisation a tragic hero. Antony is represented as, a strumpets fool. Helpless when face with Cleopatras charms and womanly assets, in addition establishing a distinct intimacy with the reader in pass judgment one of his weaknesses is Cleopatra. The striking imagery Shakespeare uses to describe Cleopatra and Antonys family relationship we are reminded of the image of the angle caught on her hook, and are in no way strike to learn that at their fi...